Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Do something: KFC and cause marketing.

Disclaimer: KFC is a client of Draftfcb. I do not currently work on KFC, nor do I have any insider information about the Pink Bucket (or any other) campaign. These are my opinions only.

If a tree falls in the forest and you don't particularly support the tree or the way in which it was taken down, is the wood useless? Should you throw it away? Or should you use it to build something anyway?

That was ridiculous. My apologies.

On that vein, Seth Godin's blog recently offered up a little something that made me think.

"You can spend your marketing money in more ways than ever, live in more places while still working electronically, contact different people, launch different initiatives, hire different freelancers... You can post your ideas in dozens of ways, interact with millions of people, launch any sort of product or service without a permit or factory.

But no matter what, don't do nothing."

Do something. 

I've been conducting a bit of personal research lately about the ethics of cause marketing. Nothing official, just kind of... listening. I've noticed that there is a lot, a LOT of discussion around whether cause marketing is abhorrent. Yes, cause marketing happens when brands align with good causes and probably aim to boost their brand metrics in the process. Yes, that smells like exploitation. What I'm wondering is, in the case of a cause, does it matter? Isn't doing something better than doing nothing?




There's a lot of dissent around the KFC Pink Bucket campaign for Susan G. Komen for the Cure. You buy the pink bucket of chicken at KFC, and fifty cents on your purchase goes to Susan G. Komen for the cure. On Twitter, in the blogosphere, kind of all over, people are really pissed about this. They're furious that a brand that can be linked to obesity, which increases one's chances of contracting cancer, would purport to care about an anti-cancer message. And, they're furious with Komen for agreeing to align with it.

What exactly are the dissenters condemning? There is nothing illegal going on here. People are purchasing chicken of their own free will, and part of the proceeds are going to something better.

Sure, KFC sells a whole bunch of really fattening awful stuff. But, they wouldn't sell it if we weren't buying it. And yes, people could skip the pink bucket and donate their entire chicken dinner fund to cancer research, circumventing the entire program. But would we? We don't seem to be doing so currently.




Consider this chart. KFC, I'd say, sits squarely in the 'evil, but beneficial to society' quadrant with the rest of corporate America. Sure, corporate America is evil. It's malicious, it's vicious, and it looks out for itself above all others. But it also creates jobs for Americans and provides a means for us to sustain ourselves as a country, at least for the time being. So, beneficial to society. The vast majority of industry, the real moneymakers out there, sit somewhere in this quadrant. Should we force them to stay there?

Does being pegged in an evil quadrant disallow KFC from being able to dabble in the good? As far as I know, the money they donate is worth just as much regardless of whether they are hoping to boost brand favorability ratings in the process. No, I would never say that KFC is an agent for goodwill. That said, should Komen have turned them down? Should KFC be excused to do nothing?

Nay-sayers, I urge you to take your judgy eyes off the means and focus on the end.

Per Daily Finance, if KFC donates the $8.5 million that they've hinted at, that would be the largest single donation in the history of the Komen foundation. My boobs and I agree that if chicken money finds a cure for breast cancer, we are okay with that. I am also okay with chicken money saving my mom's life, my grandmother's lives, my friends' lives and the lives of every woman (and man!) that has ever and will ever be threatened by breast cancer. My boobs and I will take your chicken money, KFC. Thanks for offering.

All of this says something really hypocritical about society. The American dream dictates we be doers, yet we seem to get to pick and choose who's allowed to do. If we condemn cause marketing because it's not pure, where do we draw the line in terms of trying to do good? Are hybrid cars okay? NASA? Livestrong? Hybrid cars aren't going to save the planet, NASA rockets burn a serious amount of fossil fuels, and some people say Lance Armstrong is kind of a jerk. None of these entities are free of flaws. But we see merit in working to do something, and we excuse the flaws of these organizations to allow them to do so. There is no merit in sitting on your ass, and yet this is what society is prescribing for brands rather than allowing them to leave to play in the cause marketing arena.

I guess I just don't understand what is so awful about trying to do something, regardless of your flaws.

Doing something is better than doing nothing. 

To the people who argue against cause marketing: there is no pleasing you, so I'm not going to try. But I will encourage you to take some initiative to change your quadrant, like our evil friends at KFC. The poorly-felled wood in the forest deserves a shot at construction, don't you think?

28 comments:

  1. Nice Jen. Sure KFC's intent is obvious: deflect attention off the Double Down Cardiacor but this effort is much better than throwing a healthy menu item in the mix that no one will buy anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. Healthier Food: Grilled Chicken

    2. Unhealthiest of Food: Double Down

    3. Unhealthy food for health: Pink Buckets

    I think it's great that they are doing something for charity. But I think it's just the latest example of a brand that has seemingly lost it's way just trying desperately to do anything to get sales up. It's confusing. I don't know whether they are the angel on my right shoulder or the devil on my left. Do I go there to indulge, or do I go there to get something good for me and do good for others? Doing things is great, but I think it's important to stand for something first.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for writing this post, and I apologize in advance for the ramble.

    I understand people's issue with cause marketing. The system that allows corporations and brands to succeed also sustains, and in many cases creates, the issues these brands are trying to fix or help. By supporting cause marketing, we are supporting the very system that causes these social issues in the first place, allowing brands to increase profits while we don't attempt to attack the fundamental root of the problem.

    That being said, this means that cause marketing critics either have to start a revolution, or provide a viable alternative to the system we have in place.

    I don't see either of these things happening, so I am excited that brands are making the world a little bit better, even if it means that the structure that causes the problems that they are trying to solve is kept intact.

    I guess I just believe that brands actually doing something to improve the lives of someone, no matter their intentions, is a lot better than doing nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tim - thank you for reading, and thanks twice as much for commenting. Totally agree!

    Kevin - Totally agree with you as well. I by no means intended to comment on whether this was good branding, the right campaign, or the right message for KFC to be putting out. I just don't see why it should be condemned as unethical, or why people are actually furious about it. Or that people are more concerned with whether the marketing is good than the idea of donating to charity. It just all seems a little backwards.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Danny - agree!! Agree agree agree. Man. I should have just let you write it. I think you said it better than I did. Awesome. Thank you for commenting.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah ... I had just been thinking about it lately so I couldn't keep my big yap closed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. :) I like when you open your yap.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great article Jen! I've never understood why people get so uptight about ethics and morality in such contexts either.

    Personally, I think KFC should have played up the "breast" connection. They could have said 10%/25%/whatever of all meals including breast meat would be donated to the campaign for the cure.

    Since they charge more for breast meat (and perhaps make more profit off it?), I imagine they could have raised MORE money for the charity while encouraged higher sales now and in the future. That's win-win.

    Plus, they could have run awesome campaign slogans like "Eat our breasts to save yours." Or perhaps, "Love breasts? We do too!" Sorry, I'm having trouble coming up with something pithy and inoffensive, but you get the idea. The right use of humor might have gone a long way in their campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oh my gosh. That is so awesome. Hahahahaha I love it. I am guessing they didn't want to toe the line by suggesting that their food was healthy, but still. Hilarious. :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. You might be interested in reading this:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/01/AR2009070103936.html

    It's on Facebook activism, and your post reminds me of it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. i am LOVING that chart! wish i had a client preso i could stick it in.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I truly appreciated your chart. hahaha.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hey, It really is incredibly fantastic and informative website. Good to discover your site Very well article! I’m simply in love with it.
    -------------------
    Graphic design specialist

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi, is it rite to simply study from publications not to pay a quick visit web for latest updates, what you say guys?
    Professional photo editing services

    ReplyDelete
  15. This article is really fascinating subsequent to there's such a variety of valuable information inside. Express gratitude toward you.We require more data like this regularly. Trust you'll routinely overhaul this web in the future.We require more information like this once a day. Trust you'll routinely overhaul this web in the future.This article is really intriguing following there's such a large number of helpful information inside. Much obliged to you.
    Retaining Wall Contractors La Jolla

    ReplyDelete
  16. It's nice blog I have really enjoyed keeping up with you on this blog.This is very useful post for everyone. Thank you so much this post.

    __________________________
    display letters new orleans

    ReplyDelete
  17. My partner and I stumbled over here different website and thought I might as well check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to checking out your web page repeatedly.
    Chiropractic Houston

    ReplyDelete
  18. We need more info like this on a daily basis. Hope you'll regularly update this web in the future. This article is pretty interesting since there's so many useful info inside. Thank you.

    http://shop4pills.us/celebrex_generic.html

    ReplyDelete
  19. Does your blog have a contact page? I’m having problems locating it but, I’d like to shoot you an email. I’ve got some recommendations for your blog you might be interested in hearing.
    Teff Flour

    ReplyDelete
  20. This online journal is exceptionally educational and I get a kick out of the chance to peruse these sorts of sites. It makes another thought for me to grow my composition abilities. Great to visit here and wish to be perused new and novel web journals for what's to come.

    ----------------
    Perfect money e-voucher

    ReplyDelete

Thoughts?